Autonomous agents operating in dynamic and safety-critical environments require decision-making frameworks that are both computationally efficient and physically grounded. However, many existing approaches rely on end-to-end learning, which often lacks interpretability and explicit mechanisms for ensuring consistency with physical constraints. In this work, we propose an event-centric world modeling framework with memory-augmented retrieval for embodied decision-making. The framework represents the environment as a structured set of semantic events, which are encoded into a permutation-invariant latent representation. Decision-making is performed via retrieval over a knowledge bank of prior experiences, where each entry associates an event representation with a corresponding maneuver. The final action is computed as a weighted combination of retrieved solutions, providing a transparent link between decision and stored experiences. The proposed design enables structured abstraction of dynamic environments and supports interpretable decision-making through case-based reasoning. In addition, incorporating physics-informed knowledge into the retrieval process encourages the selection of maneuvers that are consistent with observed system dynamics. Experimental evaluation in UAV flight scenarios demonstrates that the framework operates within real-time control constraints while maintaining interpretable and consistent behavior.
Authors' comments: This is the initial version (v1) released to establish priority for the proposed framework. Subsequent versions will include expanded experimental validation and exhaustive hardware benchmarking
Recent studies show that neural retrievers often display source bias, favoring passages generated by LLMs over human-written ones, even when both are semantically similar. This bias has been considered an inherent flaw of retrievers, raising concerns about the fairness and reliability of modern information access systems. Our work challenges this view by showing that source bias stems from supervision in retrieval datasets rather than the models themselves. We found that non-semantic differences, like fluency and term specificity, exist between positive and negative documents, mirroring differences between LLM and human texts. In the embedding space, the bias direction from negatives to positives aligns with the direction from human-written to LLM-generated texts. We theoretically show that retrievers inevitably absorb the artifact imbalances in the training data during contrastive learning, which leads to their preferences over LLM texts. To mitigate the effect, we propose two approaches: 1) reducing artifact differences in training data and 2) adjusting LLM text vectors by removing their projection on the bias vector. Both methods substantially reduce source bias. We hope our study alleviates some concerns regarding LLM-generated texts in information access systems.
Legal information retrieval in Portuguese remains difficult to evaluate systematically because available datasets differ widely in document type, query style, and relevance definition. We present \textsc{JUÁ}, a public benchmark for Brazilian legal retrieval designed to support more reproducible and comparable evaluation across heterogeneous legal collections. More broadly, \textsc{JUÁ} is intended not only as a benchmark, but as a continuous evaluation infrastructure for Brazilian legal IR, combining shared protocols, common ranking metrics, fixed splits when applicable, and a public leaderboard. The benchmark covers jurisprudence retrieval as well as broader legislative, regulatory, and question-driven legal search. We evaluate lexical, dense, and BM25-based reranking pipelines, including a domain-adapted Qwen embedding model fine-tuned on \textsc{JUÁ}-aligned supervision. Results show that the benchmark is sufficiently heterogeneous to distinguish retrieval paradigms and reveal substantial cross-dataset trade-offs. Domain adaptation yields its clearest gains on the supervision-aligned \textsc{JUÁ-Juris} subset, while BM25 remains highly competitive on other collections, especially in settings with strong lexical and institutional phrasing cues. Overall, \textsc{JUÁ} provides a practical evaluation framework for studying legal retrieval across multiple Brazilian legal domains under a common benchmark design.
Dense retrievers in retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems exhibit systematic biases -- including brevity, position, literal matching, and repetition biases -- that can compromise retrieval quality. Query rewriting techniques are now standard in RAG pipelines, yet their impact on these biases remains unexplored. We present the first systematic study of how query enhancement techniques affect dense retrieval biases, evaluating five methods across six retrievers. Our findings reveal that simple LLM-based rewriting achieves the strongest aggregate bias reduction (54\%), yet fails under adversarial conditions where multiple biases combine. Mechanistic analysis uncovers two distinct mechanisms: simple rewriting reduces bias through increased score variance, while pseudo-document generation methods achieve reduction through genuine decorrelation from bias-inducing features. However, no technique uniformly addresses all biases, and effects vary substantially across retrievers. Our results provide practical guidance for selecting query enhancement strategies based on specific bias vulnerabilities. More broadly, we establish a taxonomy distinguishing query-document interaction biases from document encoding biases, clarifying the limits of query-side interventions for debiasing RAG systems.
Authors' comments: ACL'26: 13 pages, 4 figures, 4 tables
Large language models (LLMs) have made notable progress in logical reasoning, yet still fall short of human-level performance. Current boosting strategies rely on expert-crafted in-domain demonstrations, limiting their applicability in expertise-scarce domains, such as specialized mathematical reasoning, formal logic, or legal analysis. In this work, we demonstrate the feasibility of leveraging cross-domain demonstrating examples to boost the LLMs' reasoning performance. Despite substantial domain differences, many reusable implicit logical structures are shared across domains. In order to effectively retrieve cross-domain examples for unseen domains under investigation, in this work, we further propose an effective retrieval method, called domain-invariant neurons-based retrieval (\textbf{DIN-Retrieval}). Concisely, DIN-Retrieval first summarizes a hidden representation that is universal across different domains. Then, during the inference stage, we use the DIN vector to retrieve structurally compatible cross-domain demonstrations for the in-context learning. Experimental results in multiple settings for the transfer of mathematical and logical reasoning demonstrate that our method achieves an average improvement of 1.8 over the state-of-the-art methods \footnote{Our implementation is available at https://github.com/Leon221220/DIN-Retrieval}.
Authors' comments: ACL 2026 Findings
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) mitigates hallucination but does not eliminate it: a deployed system must still decide, at inference time, whether its answer is actually supported by the retrieved evidence. We introduce LatentAudit, a white-box auditor that pools mid-to-late residual-stream activations from an open-weight generator and measures their Mahalanobis distance to the evidence representation. The resulting quadratic rule requires no auxiliary judge model, runs at generation time, and is simple enough to calibrate on a small held-out set. We show that residual-stream geometry carries a usable faithfulness signal, that this signal survives architecture changes and realistic retrieval failures, and that the same rule remains amenable to public verification. On PubMedQA with Llama-3-8B, LatentAudit reaches 0.942 AUROC with 0.77,ms overhead. Across three QA benchmarks and five model families (Llama-2/3, Qwen-2.5/3, Mistral), the monitor remains stable; under a four-way stress test with contradictions, retrieval misses, and partial-support noise, it reaches 0.9566--0.9815 AUROC on PubMedQA and 0.9142--0.9315 on HotpotQA. At 16-bit fixed-point precision, the audit rule preserves 99.8% of the FP16 AUROC, enabling Groth16-based public verification without revealing model weights or activations. Together, these results position residual-stream geometry as a practical basis for real-time RAG faithfulness monitoring and optional verifiable deployment.
Skill usage has become a core component of modern agent systems and can substantially improve agents' ability to complete complex tasks. In real-world settings, where agents must monitor and interact with numerous personal applications, web browsers, and other environment interfaces, skill libraries can scale to thousands of reusable skills. Scaling to larger skill sets introduces two key challenges. First, loading the full skill set saturates the context window, driving up token costs, hallucination, and latency.
In this paper, we present Graph of Skills (GoS), an inference-time structural retrieval layer for large skill libraries. GoS constructs an executable skill graph offline from skill packages, then at inference time retrieves a bounded, dependency-aware skill bundle through hybrid semantic-lexical seeding, reverse-weighted Personalized PageRank, and context-budgeted hydration. On SkillsBench and ALFWorld, GoS improves average reward by 43.6% over the vanilla full skill-loading baseline while reducing input tokens by 37.8%, and generalizes across three model families: Claude Sonnet, GPT-5.2 Codex, and MiniMax. Additional ablation studies across skill libraries ranging from 200 to 2,000 skills further demonstrate that GoS consistently outperforms both vanilla skills loading and simple vector retrieval in balancing reward, token efficiency, and runtime.
Authors' comments: 13 pages of main text, 13 pages of appendix. Core contribution by Dawei Li and Zongxia Li. Project page: https://github.com/davidliuk/graph-of-skills
Background: Children do not simply learn that balls are round and blocks are square. They learn that shape is the kind of feature that tends to define object categories -- a second-order generalisation known as an overhypothesis [1, 2]. What kind of learning mechanism is sufficient for this inductive leap? Methods: We trained autoregressive transformer language models (3.4M-25.6M parameters) on synthetic corpora in which shape is the stable feature dimension across categories, with eight conditions controlling for alternative explanations. Results: Across 120 pre-registered runs evaluated on a 1,040-item wug test battery, every model achieved perfect first-order exemplar retrieval (100%) while second-order generalisation to novel nouns remained at chance (50-52%), a result confirmed by equivalence testing. A feature-swap diagnostic revealed that models rely on frame-to-feature template matching rather than structured noun-to-domain-to-feature abstraction. Conclusions: These results reveal a clear limitation of autoregressive distributional sequence learning under developmental-scale training conditions.
Authors' comments: 27 pages, 7 figures, 22 references. Pre-registered study (OSF: https://osf.io/qj9hb/). Code and data: https://github.com/synthiumjp/overhypothesis. Submitted to Cognitive Computation
Entity-oriented retrieval assumes that relevant documents exhibit query-relevant entities, yet evaluations report conflicting results. We show this inconsistency stems not from model failure, but from evaluation.
On TREC Robust04, we evaluate six neural rerankers and 437 unsupervised configurations against BM25. Across 443 systems, none improves MAP by more than 0.05 under open-world evaluation over the full candidate set, despite strong gains under entity-restricted settings. The best configuration matches the official Robust04 best system and outperforms most neural rerankers, indicating that the architecture is not the limiting factor. Instead, the bottleneck is the entity channel: even under idealized selection, entity signals cover only 19.7\% of relevant documents, and no method achieves both high coverage and discrimination.
We explain this via a distinction between Conceptual Entity Relevance (CER) -- semantic relatedness -- and Observable Entity Relevance (OER) -- corpus-grounded discriminativeness under a given linker. All supervision strategies operate at the CER level and ignore the linking environment, leading to signals that are semantically valid but not discriminative. Improving supervision therefore does not recover open-world performance: stronger signals reduce coverage without improving effectiveness.
Conditional and open-world evaluation answer different questions: exploiting entity evidence versus improving retrieval under realistic linking, but are often conflated. Progress requires datasets with entity-level discriminativeness and evaluation that reports both coverage and effectiveness. Until then, conditional gains do not imply open-world effectiveness, and open-world failures do not invalidate entity-based models.
Transferring knowledge from a cross-encoder teacher via Knowledge Distillation (KD) has become a standard paradigm for training retrieval models. While existing studies have largely focused on mining hard negatives to improve discrimination, the systematic composition of training data and the resulting teacher score distribution have received relatively less attention. In this work, we highlight that focusing solely on hard negatives prevents the student from learning the comprehensive preference structure of the teacher, potentially hampering generalization. To effectively emulate the teacher score distribution, we propose a Stratified Sampling strategy that uniformly covers the entire score spectrum. Experiments on in-domain and out-of-domain benchmarks confirm that Stratified Sampling, which preserves the variance and entropy of teacher scores, serves as a robust baseline, significantly outperforming top-K and random sampling in diverse settings. These findings suggest that the essence of distillation lies in preserving the diverse range of relative scores perceived by the teacher.
Authors' comments: Accepted to SIGIR 2026 Main Conference
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) grounds large language models in external medical knowledge, yet standard retrievers frequently surface hard negatives that are semantically close to the query but describe clinically distinct conditions. While existing query-expansion methods improve query representation to mitigate ambiguity, they typically focus on enriching target-relevant semantics without an explicit mechanism to selectively suppress specific, clinically plausible hard negatives. This leaves the system prone to retrieving plausible mimics that overshadow the actual diagnosis, particularly when such mimics are dominant within the corpus. We propose Contrastive Hypothesis Retrieval (CHR), a framework inspired by the process of clinical differential diagnosis. CHR generates a target hypothesis $H^+$ for the likely correct answer and a mimic hypothesis $H^-$ for the most plausible incorrect alternative, then scores documents by promoting $H^+$-aligned evidence while penalizing $H^-$-aligned content. Across three medical QA benchmarks and three answer generators, CHR outperforms all five baselines in every configuration, with improvements of up to 10.4 percentage points over the next-best method. On the $n=587$ pooled cases where CHR answers correctly while embedded hypothetical-document query expansion does not, 85.2\% have no shared documents between the top-5 retrieval lists of CHR and of that baseline, consistent with substantive retrieval redirection rather than light re-ranking of the same candidates. By explicitly modeling what to avoid alongside what to find, CHR bridges clinical reasoning with retrieval mechanism design and offers a practical path to reducing hard-negative contamination in medical RAG systems.
Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) is highly sensitive to process parameters, which influence defect formation through complex thermal and fluid mechanisms. However, defect-related knowledge is dispersed across the literature, limiting systematic understanding. This study presents a graph-assisted retrieval framework for defect reasoning in LPBF, using Ti6Al4V as a case study. Scientific publications are transformed into a structured representation, and relationships between parameters, mechanisms, and defects are encoded into an evidence-linked knowledge graph. The framework integrates semantic and graph-based retrieval, supported by a lightweight agent-based reasoning layer to construct interpretable defect pathways. Evaluation shows high retrieval accuracy (0.9667) and recall (0.9667), demonstrating effective identification of relevant defect related evidence. The framework enables transparent reasoning chains linking process parameters to defects. This work provides a scalable approach for converting unstructured literature into a query able and interpretable knowledge resource for additive manufacturing.
The estimand framework provides guidance on handling intercurrent events, such as treatment discontinuation, in the analysis of clinical trial responses. Under ICH E9(R1), the treatment policy (TP) strategy incorporates post-discontinuation data to reflect treatment effects in real-world practice. However, many existing approaches focus primarily on imputing missing endpoint values for lost-to-follow-up subjects and do not explicitly model completers, retrieved dropouts (RDs), and lost-to-follow-up subjects within a unified framework. This may obscure the relationship between modeling assumptions and the estimand of interest when RD data are present. We propose a likelihood-based model for continuous endpoints that integrates data from all subject categories, including RDs. The approach combines an analysis of covariance formulation with a probit model for treatment discontinuation, enabling explicit formulation of treatment effects for estimands defined using the hypothetical and TP strategies. Estimation is carried out via a computationally efficient maximum likelihood procedure. Numerical studies demonstrate that the proposed method achieves improved bias and variability properties compared with commonly used imputation-based approaches.
Authors' comments: 27 pages, 3 figures, 8 tables
Detecting AI-generated images remains a significant challenge because detectors trained on specific generators often fail to generalize to unseen models; however, while pixel-level artifacts vary across models, frequency-domain signatures exhibit greater consistency, providing a promising foundation for cross-generator detection. To address this, we propose SPARK-IL, a retrieval-augmented framework that combines dual-path spectral analysis with incremental learning by utilizing a partially frozen ViT-L/14 encoder for semantic representations alongside a parallel path for raw RGB pixel embeddings. Both paths undergo multi-band Fourier decomposition into four frequency bands, which are individually processed by Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KAN) with mixture-of-experts for band-specific transformations before the resulting spectral embeddings are fused via cross-attention with residual connections. During inference, this fused embedding retrieves the $k$ nearest labeled signatures from a Milvus database using cosine similarity to facilitate predictions via majority voting, while an incremental learning strategy expands the database and employs elastic weight consolidation to preserve previously learned transformations. Evaluated on the UniversalFakeDetect benchmark across 19 generative models -- including GANs, face-swapping, and diffusion methods -- SPARK-IL achieves a 94.6\% mean accuracy, with the code to be publicly released at https://github.com/HessenUPHF/SPARK-IL.
Large language model retrievers improve performance on complex queries, but their practical value depends on efficiency, robustness, and reliable confidence signals in addition to accuracy. We reproduce a reasoning-intensive retrieval benchmark (BRIGHT) across 12 tasks and 14 retrievers, and extend evaluation with cold-start indexing cost, query latency distributions and throughput, corpus scaling, robustness to controlled query perturbations, and confidence use (AUROC) for predicting query success. We also quantify \emph{reasoning overhead} by comparing standard queries to five provided reasoning-augmented variants, measuring accuracy gains relative to added latency. We find that some reasoning-specialized retrievers achieve strong effectiveness while remaining competitive in throughput, whereas several large LLM-based bi-encoders incur substantial latency for modest gains. Reasoning augmentation incurs minimal latency for sub-1B encoders but exhibits diminishing returns for top retrievers and may reduce performance on formal math/code domains. Confidence calibration is consistently weak across model families, indicating that raw retrieval scores are unreliable for downstream routing without additional calibration. We release all code and artifacts for reproducibility.
Authors' comments: Accepted at SIGIR 2026
Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) is rapidly reshaping digital marketing paradigms in the era of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, current GEO strategies predominantly rely on Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), which inherently suffers from probabilistic hallucinations and the "zero-click" paradox, failing to establish sustainable commercial trust. In this paper, we systematically deconstruct the probabilistic flaws of existing RAG-based GEO and propose a paradigm shift towards deterministic multi-agent intent routing. First, we mathematically formulate Semantic Entropy Drift (SED) to model the dynamic decay of confidence curves in LLMs over continuous temporal and contextual perturbations. To rigorously quantify optimization value in black-box commercial engines, we introduce the Isomorphic Attribution Regression (IAR) model, leveraging a Multi-Agent System (MAS) probe with strict human-in-the-loop physical isolation to enforce hallucination penalties. Furthermore, we architect the Deterministic Agent Handoff (DAH) protocol, conceptualizing an Agentic Trust Brokerage (ATB) ecosystem where LLMs function solely as intent routers rather than final answer generators. We empirically validate this architecture using EasyNote, an industrial AI meeting minutes product by Yishu Technology. By routing the intent of "knowledge graph mapping on an infinite canvas" directly to its specialized proprietary agent via DAH, we demonstrate the reduction of vertical task hallucination rates to near zero. This work establishes a foundational theoretical framework for next-generation GEO and paves the way for a well-ordered, deterministic human-AI collaboration ecosystem.
Partially Relevant Video Retrieval (PRVR) aims to retrieve untrimmed videos based on text queries that describe only partial events. Existing methods suffer from incomplete global contextual perception, struggling with query ambiguity and local noise induced by spurious responses. To address these issues, we propose DreamPRVR, which adopts a coarse-to-fine representation learning paradigm. The model first generates global contextual semantic registers as coarse-grained highlights spanning the entire video and then concentrates on fine-grained similarity optimization for precise cross-modal matching. Concretely, these registers are generated by initializing from the video-centric distribution produced by a probabilistic variational sampler and then iteratively refined via a text-supervised truncated diffusion model. During this process, textual semantic structure learning constructs a well-formed textual latent space, enhancing the reliability of global perception. The registers are then adaptively fused with video tokens through register-augmented Gaussian attention blocks, enabling context-aware feature learning. Extensive experiments show that DreamPRVR outperforms state-of-the-art methods. Code is released at https://github.com/lijun2005/CVPR26-DreamPRVR.
Authors' comments: Accepted to CVPR 2026. 15 pages, 7 figures, 3 tables
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) mitigates hallucinations in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), yet existing systems struggle with complex cross-modal reasoning. Flat vector retrieval often ignores structural dependencies, while current graph-based methods rely on costly ``translation-to-text'' pipelines that discard fine-grained visual information. To address these limitations, we propose \textbf{MG$^2$-RAG}, a lightweight \textbf{M}ulti-\textbf{G}ranularity \textbf{G}raph \textbf{RAG} framework that jointly improves graph construction, modality fusion, and cross-modal retrieval. MG$^2$-RAG constructs a hierarchical multimodal knowledge graph by combining lightweight textual parsing with entity-driven visual grounding, enabling textual entities and visual regions to be fused into unified multimodal nodes that preserve atomic evidence. Building on this representation, we introduce a multi-granularity graph retrieval mechanism that aggregates dense similarities and propagates relevance across the graph to support structured multi-hop reasoning. Extensive experiments across four representative multimodal tasks (i.e., retrieval, knowledge-based VQA, reasoning, and classification) demonstrate that MG$^2$-RAG consistently achieves state-of-the-art performance while reducing graph construction overhead with an average 43.3$\times$ speedup and 23.9$\times$ cost reduction compared with advanced graph-based frameworks.
AI agents operating over extended time horizons accumulate experiences that serve multiple concurrent goals, and must often maintain conflicting interpretations of the same events. A concession during a client negotiation encodes as a ``trust-building investment'' for one strategic goal and a ``contractual liability'' for another. Current memory architectures assume a single correct encoding, or at best support multiple views over unified storage. We propose Rashomon Memory: an architecture where parallel goal-conditioned agents encode experiences according to their priorities and negotiate at query time through argumentation. Each perspective maintains its own ontology and knowledge graph. At retrieval, perspectives propose interpretations, critique each other's proposals using asymmetric domain knowledge, and Dung's argumentation semantics determines which proposals survive. The resulting attack graph is itself an explanation: it records which interpretation was selected, which alternatives were considered, and on what grounds they were rejected. We present a proof-of-concept showing that retrieval modes (selection, composition, conflict surfacing) emerge from attack graph topology, and that the conflict surfacing mode, where the system reports genuine disagreement rather than forcing resolution, lets decision-makers see the underlying interpretive conflict directly.
Authors' comments: Accepted to the EXTRAAMAS workshop at AAMAS 2026
Multi-hop retrieval is not a single-step relevance problem: later-hop evidence should be ranked by its utility conditioned on retrieved bridge evidence, not by similarity to the original query alone. We present BridgeRAG, a training-free, graph-free retrieval method for retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) over multi-hop questions that operationalizes this view with a tripartite scorer s(q,b,c) over (question, bridge, candidate). BridgeRAG separates coverage from scoring: dual-entity ANN expansion broadens the second-hop candidate pool, while a bridge-conditioned LLM judge identifies the active reasoning chain among competing candidates without any offline graph or proposition index. Across four controlled experiments we show that this conditioning signal is (i) selective: +2.55pp on parallel-chain queries (p<0.001) vs. ~0 on single-chain subtypes; (ii) irreplaceable: substituting the retrieved passage with generated SVO query text reduces R@5 by 2.1pp, performing worse than even the lowest-SVO-similarity pool passage; (iii) predictable: cos(b,g2) correlates with per-query gain (Spearman rho=0.104, p<0.001); and (iv) mechanistically precise: bridge conditioning causes productive re-rankings (18.7% flip-win rate on parallel-chain vs. 0.6% on single-chain), not merely more churn. Combined with lightweight coverage expansion and percentile-rank score fusion, BridgeRAG achieves the best published training-free R@5 under matched benchmark evaluation on all three standard MHQA benchmarks without a graph database or any training: 0.8146 on MuSiQue (+3.1pp vs. PropRAG, +6.8pp vs. HippoRAG2), 0.9527 on 2WikiMultiHopQA (+1.2pp vs. PropRAG), and 0.9875 on HotpotQA (+1.35pp vs. PropRAG).
Authors' comments: 11 pages, 4 figures
